Main menu:

Notes:

A) Blogger is extremely ADD. Expect posts do jump topics more often than Democrats changing positions. Blogger is also conservative on pretty much everything. B) As far as this blogger is concerned, the SSPX is at least irregular canonically, if not in outright schism. I'm sure there are many holy people in the group, and for some the SSPX Mass could well be the only alternative to worshiping the "Earth goddess" in their home parish, but otherwise, a Catholic is morally bound to attend a Mass offered according to the permissions in Summorum Pontificum, should he wish to worship according to the Extraordinary form. C) Just because I link to a site DOES NOT mean I condone every last link and statement ON that site. I take no responsibility for where you go after leaving my blog.

Pages

 

October 2008
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Site search

Meta

Archives

Categories

Archive for 'CWN'

2 Updates this close together? Say it ain’t so!

Listening to that right now. Just pop it open in another tab and listen to the pretty chant.

This makes me smile. It also clarifies the nature of the excommunications for the SSPX.
I’m at work right now. I was treated to a great hand bell choir concert as a result. My final (I [...]

Posted: March 29th, 2008 under CWN, SSPX, TLM, ecclesia dei, ramble, summorum pontificum.
Comments: none

Feeding the Motu rumor mill =-P

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=51821
I trust CWNews pretty solidly, for what that’s worth.
Now if only I thought any priest around here would offer the TLM once permission is granted…and, someone please correct me if I’m wrong, I’ve never heard of Cardnal George being strict with his permissions to say the TLM in the first place.  My understanding is that there’s just [...]

Posted: June 15th, 2007 under BXVI, CWN, TLM, motu propio, news, rumor.
Comments: none