<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>るろうに (Rurouni) Theologan &#187; contraception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/category/contraception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com</link>
	<description>Just another StBlogs.com weblog, this time by a 浪人 (rounin) theology BA.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Marriage and the Reformation</title>
		<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2009/02/04/marriage-and-the-reformation/</link>
		<comments>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2009/02/04/marriage-and-the-reformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesusfreak84</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["reformation"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anglican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protestant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, unrelated to the main post, I&#8217;d like to update the sidebar on this blog to reflect the current canonical status of the SSPX, (regardless of foolish opinions held by Bp. Williamson,) but I&#8217;ve kind of forgotten how to do so&#8230;.sorry!
Anyway, my point here this evening is to make a short-and-to-the-point statement on how the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, unrelated to the main post, I&#8217;d like to update the sidebar on this blog to reflect the current canonical status of the SSPX, (regardless of foolish opinions held by Bp. Williamson,) but I&#8217;ve kind of forgotten how to do so&#8230;.sorry!</p>
<p>Anyway, my point here this evening is to make a short-and-to-the-point statement on how the many crises facing marriage today can be traced back to the tragedy of history commonly known as the Protestant Reformation, though I&#8217;m one of those who believes &#8220;revolt&#8221; and &#8220;rebellion&#8221; to be more accurate terms.  After reading this, I suspect readers will be able to understand why I hold the position that a return to a universal recognition of marriage as a Sacrament is the only way it will survive the current socio-political climate, not just here in the United States, but everywhere.</p>
<p>Prior to the Reformation, all Christians shared the proper understanding of marriage as one of the seven Sacraments established by Christ Himself.  (That starts one issue I take with the, &#8220;We all worship the same Jesus!&#8221; approach to ecumenism: the Jesus that Catholics and Orthodox Christians believe in, the real Jesus and the Jesus of history, established SEVEN Sacraments, not one, two, or none, depending on which Protestant sect you follow.)  The Church managed the Sacrament, not the State, and the State obediently let the Church &#8220;do Her thing&#8221; as regarded it.</p>
<p>Then comes the Reformation.</p>
<p>By diminishing marriage as a Sacrament, the rebels, intentionally or not, regulated it to a mere civil contract.  (Anglicans, anyone?)  As we&#8217;ve clearly seen, especially in the past half-century in the US, marriage that is merely a civil contract can be dissolved for any reason whatsoever.  The State now regulates marriages and it sets its own rules regarding it.  Furthermore, the &#8220;Reformation&#8221; encouraged a arrogant level of autonomy, one example being in the individual&#8217;s &#8220;right&#8221; to &#8220;interpret&#8221; Scripture however he sees fit, (the incomplete canon they have to interpret is another problem all together.)  This autonomy is further shown in how Christians now think they &#8220;own&#8221; their own bodies, so of course contracept and abort all you want!  No Church has the right to tell you what to believe!  If YOUR interpretation of Scripture says you can close your womb of your own volition, and you&#8217;ve &#8220;really&#8221; prayed for the guidance of the Holy Spirit on this one, then that&#8217;s fine!  I do believe it worth noting, though, that it is unlikely that the &#8220;reformers&#8221; themselves would like where their thought has gone today.  I doubt Luther would look at the ecclesial community, (NOT!!! Church,) that bares his name today and recognize it as anything he wanted to achieve.  When marriage is merely a civil contract, who is the State to deny it to two men, or two women, or one man and several women?  The atheistic state has no grounds for doing so, but the Christian faith does.</p>
<p>Anyway, my point is that the &#8220;reformation&#8221; shifted the &#8220;responsibility&#8221; for marriage from the Church, where it rightfully belongs, to the State.  Never mind Christ&#8217;s instruction, &#8220;What God has joined together, let no man tear asunder!&#8221;  If you want to know what the greatest threat to Satan is at any given time in history, look at what the fiend attacks most viciously.  Right now, it&#8217;s marriage, so imagine the power that a strong, Catholic family has, the &#8220;domestic Church,&#8221; modeled after the Holy Family, has to turn this culture AGAINST Satan&#8217;s wishes for it!</p>
<p>As a disclaimer, I know full well not every last Protestant accepts or likes divorce.  My boyfriend came from such a home and he views divorce as a non-option for any professed Christian.</p>
<p>Aaaaand&#8230;I&#8217;m being summoned.  I might elaborate on this further later, if Java homework doesn&#8217;t kill me first!  =-S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2009/02/04/marriage-and-the-reformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another awesome episode of &#8220;The Vortex&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2008/10/07/another-awesome-episode-of-the-vortex/</link>
		<comments>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2008/10/07/another-awesome-episode-of-the-vortex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesusfreak84</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Social Teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBTWTFZOMGBBQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realcatholictv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the_vortex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(Lest the code above not work: http://www.realcatholictv.com/premium/playEmbed.swf?id=1104)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>(Lest the code above not work: http://www.realcatholictv.com/premium/playEmbed.swf?id=1104)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2008/10/07/another-awesome-episode-of-the-vortex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As a Catholic, I am insulted by the apostasy of pro-abortion &#8220;Catholics.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2008/08/27/as-a-catholic-i-am-insulted-by-the-apostasy-of-pro-abortion-catholics/</link>
		<comments>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2008/08/27/as-a-catholic-i-am-insulted-by-the-apostasy-of-pro-abortion-catholics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesusfreak84</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Social Teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://catholicsagainstjoebiden.blogspot.com/
What the dilly is up with Washington?  Guliani (alright, he&#8217;s out of the picture, but still,) Pelosi, Durbin (I&#8217;m ashamed to say that he&#8217;s ours, too, along with Obama,) Kennedy, Biden, etc. etc. etc.  What part of YOU CAN&#8217;T BE CATHOLIC AND PRO-ABORTION is so hard for these people to understand?!?!?!  I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://catholicsagainstjoebiden.blogspot.com/</p>
<p>What the dilly is up with Washington?  Guliani (alright, he&#8217;s out of the picture, but still,) Pelosi, Durbin (I&#8217;m ashamed to say that he&#8217;s ours, too, along with Obama,) Kennedy, Biden, etc. etc. etc.  What part of YOU CAN&#8217;T BE CATHOLIC AND PRO-ABORTION is so hard for these people to understand?!?!?!  I don&#8217;t want McCain to win, either, but he&#8217;s better than Obama.  Usually in this situation, I look at the Constitution Party, but I don&#8217;t know&#8230;.  The Libertarian candidate is pro-death, as far as I know, so that&#8217;s out&#8230;  Oi&#8230;  The one thing I consider a non-option is NOT voting.  I&#8217;ll write in Donald Duck if I have to.  :p</p>
<p>ADD is kicking in&#8230;*Wanders off to play with shiny objects.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2008/08/27/as-a-catholic-i-am-insulted-by-the-apostasy-of-pro-abortion-catholics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saginaw Seminarians = WIN</title>
		<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/09/12/saginaw-seminarians-win/</link>
		<comments>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/09/12/saginaw-seminarians-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesusfreak84</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/09/12/saginaw-seminarians-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://saginawseminarians.blogspot.com/
Since the summer months, they have been doing installments of a series that parodies the Mac vs. PC ads.  Installments 5 and 6 have been posted, and 6 is PURE GOLD!  ^_^
Adding the blog to the Blogroll (which I still cannot get to display in my template&#8230;.)
Funny how I have less time now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://saginawseminarians.blogspot.com/">http://saginawseminarians.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Since the summer months, they have been doing installments of a series that parodies the Mac vs. PC ads.  Installments 5 and 6 have been posted, and 6 is PURE GOLD!  ^_^</p>
<p>Adding the blog to the Blogroll (which I still cannot get to display in my template&#8230;.)</p>
<p>Funny how I have less time now than I did during the summer yet I update more often.  =-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/09/12/saginaw-seminarians-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gotta love American hypocrisy&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/08/01/gotta-love-american-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/08/01/gotta-love-american-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesusfreak84</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/08/01/gotta-love-american-hypocrisy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Camel for Contraceptives
This blog is one of the blogs I read that is written by a priest.  I like the third comment.  Remember kids!  Smoking = bad, sex = good, but hide it from your parents!
Know what?  I dare someone to make a movie like this about Mohamed.  Do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://youngfogeys.blogspot.com/2007/07/re-marketing-promiscuity.html" title="Young Fogeys" target="_blank">Joe Camel for Contraceptives</a><br />
This blog is one of the blogs I read that is written by a priest.  I like the third comment.  Remember kids!  Smoking = bad, sex = good, but hide it from your parents!</p>
<p><a href="http://theworldimho.blogspot.com/2007/07/jesus-deflowers-virgin-sexpot-in-new.html" title="The World...IMHO" target="_blank">Know what?  I dare someone to make a movie like this about Mohamed.  Do it.</a><br />
Once again, the rules of PC change when it&#8217;s the Christians being ridiculed.</p>
<p>However, I wish to leave you all with some satire: <a href="http://agnusdaily.com/opinion-3-reasons-why-the-latin-mass-simply-wont-work/" title="Agnus Daily" target="_blank">3 Reasons Why The Latin mass Won&#8217;t Work</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/08/01/gotta-love-american-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protestants and Contraception</title>
		<link>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/07/16/protestants-and-contraception/</link>
		<comments>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/07/16/protestants-and-contraception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesusfreak84</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anglican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baptist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calvinist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lutheran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presbyterian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protestant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/07/16/protestants-and-contraception/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protestants and Contraception (written from the perspective of a &#8220;cradle Lutheran&#8221;)
This article also remains, in my opinion, respectful of Catholics when we are mentioned. Martin Luther and John Calvin are the two most frequently quoted. There&#8217;s really some idealism of &#8220;Protestant Europe,&#8221; though. (Probably comparable to Catholics who over-do the Middle Ages.) Also interesting is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=20-04-020-f" title="Touchstone Magazine" target="_blank">Protestants and Contraception (written from the perspective of a &#8220;cradle Lutheran&#8221;)</a><br />
This article also remains, in my opinion, respectful of Catholics when we are mentioned. Martin Luther and John Calvin are the two most frequently quoted. There&#8217;s really some idealism of &#8220;Protestant Europe,&#8221; though. (Probably comparable to Catholics who over-do the Middle Ages.) Also interesting is how the author ties in denominations allowing women clergy feeding into the use of contraception.<br />
Thoughts?<br />
(And if I misspelled the names of any denominations in the tags, please please PLEASE correct me? Danke!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesusfreak84.stblogs.com/2007/07/16/protestants-and-contraception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
